Appropriation has got to be stupidest thing to be offended about
ever created. The basic idea is that anything that defines a culture should not
be appropriated by mainstream culture; to do so is to rape the culture and cause
it to lose whatever makes the culture unique. A recent example is the retailer that
took some Native American designs and incorporated them into dresses and jewelry
designs; some groups were so offended by what was happening that they took to signatures,
but the designs actually took off.
The reason for the offense is pretty simplistic: Everyone picks
up culture wherever they go. Most people do so unconsciously, such as picking some
vocabulary or mannerisms from another place, while others find a sweater that they
fall in love with and take it everywhere they go. Some people find a particular
type of symbols that they love, that makes them feel comfortable, and surround themselves
with them. Others do it more consciously: A particular set of symbols is perfect
for a project, and so those symbols are integrated into the project.
There is also cultural leakage: Any cultures in close apporximation
will always trade bits and pieces of their respective cultures. Either one of them
has a better solution for a particular problem, or a more comfortable style of dress,
or even something that just looks cooler; these bits of culture will usually be
in constant motion between the two cultures. Over time this creates a culture that
is actually a mix of the two cultures with purists trying sometimes vainly to keep
the cultures separate.
Worse, from the perspective of the purists, is when fashion and
jewelry designers see something that they like. This is usually where the worst
sins of appropriation come to play as the culture is mined like a gold vein for
ideas which are then converted to fashion and jewelry, usually with none of the
stories that made them important in the first place, or when those stories are perverted
for the sake of a quick buck. The symbols of an entire culture can thus end up in
the malls of the world and the originating culture gets none of the profit from
the appropriated patterns. There are some situations where this is done without
respect for the culture, such as for costumes or to exploit the culture, such as
television and movies are infamous for doing.
Nonetheless, there are a lot of times when no disrespect is meant.
There are a lot of times when it just happens, and there are other times when the
culture itself puts its symbols and stories into the marketplace. A problem can
obviously develop when a group gets tired of seeing of those things it feels defines
it being used out of context by others, be it symbols or philosophies; as there
are no copyright protections for cultures, this can create some interesting problems.
Making this really interesting is when two cultures tend to grab
a lot from each other anyway; rap music is a probably one of the best examples,
as it tends to incorporate a lot of different cultures into its lyrics and sound,
while itself being grabbed by a number of other groups. In this case it's hard to
define where exactly the leakage is happening, but it can get weird to try and track
who is borrowing from whom.
Nonetheless, this can create a number of problems. Cultures tend
to borrow from each other all the time; this helps create links between the two
cultures as well as allowing for the sharing of knowledge. With even minimal sharing
two cultures can actually become stronger as they both have more ways of dealing
with problems than they had previous. In today's world where we are connected to
everyone, this means that we can be influenced and influence cultures from other
parts of the world that even a few decades ago we had no idea that even existed,
becoming stronger as a world as each individual culture is drawn further into a
single meta-culture where ideas and beliefs can be shared.
Of course, there are those that dislike this idea. As noted above
there are those that wish to exploit other cultures for their own gain, but they
can be stopped by boycotts and by providing better examples of that culture in the
same media. This has been seen at work in that films and shows have gotten more
respectful of other cultures.
Of course you also have the isolationists who believe that cultures
should remain pure, but that's a losing battle; the culture would have to totally
isolate itself in order to prevent any contact. However, as even the Amish and various
tribes have shown, there is virtually no way to do this; cultures will always mix
to some degree, and proximity is not always a requirement, not in the Age of Internet.
It's just not a possibility any more for cultures to isolated.
No comments:
Post a Comment